Democratic People's Republic of Korea

Related publications

  • 21 Feb 2025

    High-Risk Jurisdictions subject to a Call for Action - 21 February 2025 High-risk jurisdictions have significant strategic deficiencies in their regimes to counter money laundering, terrorist financing, and financing of proliferation. For all countries identified as high-risk, the FATF calls on all members and urges all jurisdictions to apply enhanced due diligence, and, in the most serious cases, countries are called upon to apply countermeasures to protect the international financial system from the money laundering, terrorist financing, and proliferation financing (ML/TF/PF) risks emanating from the country.

  • 25 Oct 2024

    High-Risk Jurisdictions subject to a Call for Action - 25 October 2024 High-risk jurisdictions have significant strategic deficiencies in their regimes to counter money laundering, terrorist financing, and financing of proliferation. For all countries identified as high-risk, the FATF calls on all members and urges all jurisdictions to apply enhanced due diligence, and, in the most serious cases, countries are called upon to apply countermeasures to protect the international financial system from the money laundering, terrorist financing, and proliferation financing (ML/TF/PF) risks emanating from the country.

  • 28 Jun 2024

    High-Risk Jurisdictions subject to a Call for Action - June 2024 High-risk jurisdictions have significant strategic deficiencies in their regimes to counter money laundering, terrorist financing, and financing of proliferation. For all countries identified as high-risk, the FATF calls on all members and urges all jurisdictions to apply enhanced due diligence, and, in the most serious cases, countries are called upon to apply countermeasures to protect the international financial system from the money laundering, terrorist financing, and proliferation financing (ML/TF/PF) risks emanating from the country.

  • 23 Feb 2024

    High-Risk Jurisdictions subject to a Call for Action - February 2024 High-risk jurisdictions have significant strategic deficiencies in their regimes to counter money laundering, terrorist financing, and financing of proliferation. For all countries identified as high-risk, the FATF calls on all members and urges all jurisdictions to apply enhanced due diligence, and, in the most serious cases, countries are called upon to apply counter-measures to protect the international financial system from the money laundering, terrorist financing, and proliferation financing (ML/TF/PF) risks emanating from the country..

  • 27 Oct 2023

    High-Risk Jurisdictions subject to a Call for Action - October 2023 High-risk jurisdictions have significant strategic deficiencies in their regimes to counter money laundering, terrorist financing, and financing of proliferation. For all countries identified as high-risk, the FATF calls on all members and urges all jurisdictions to apply enhanced due diligence, and, in the most serious cases, countries are called upon to apply counter-measures to protect the international financial system from the money laundering, terrorist financing, and proliferation financing (ML/TF/PF) risks emanating from the country..

  • 23 Jun 2023

    High-Risk Jurisdictions subject to a Call for Action - June 2023 High-risk jurisdictions have significant strategic deficiencies in their regimes to counter money laundering, terrorist financing, and financing of proliferation. For all countries identified as high-risk, the FATF calls on all members and urges all jurisdictions to apply enhanced due diligence, and, in the most serious cases, countries are called upon to apply counter-measures to protect the international financial system from the money laundering, terrorist financing, and proliferation financing (ML/TF/PF) risks emanating from the country..

  • 24 Feb 2023

    High-Risk Jurisdictions subject to a Call for Action – 24 February 2023 High-risk jurisdictions have significant strategic deficiencies in their regimes to counter money laundering, terrorist financing, and financing of proliferation. For all countries identified as high-risk, the FATF calls on all members and urges all jurisdictions to apply enhanced due diligence, and, in the most serious cases, countries are called upon to apply counter-measures to protect the international financial system from the money laundering, terrorist financing, and proliferation financing (ML/TF/PF risks emanating from the country.

  • 21 Oct 2022

    High-Risk Jurisdictions subject to a Call for Action – 21 October 2022 High-risk jurisdictions have significant strategic deficiencies in their regimes to counter money laundering, terrorist financing, and financing of proliferation. For all countries identified as high-risk, the FATF calls on all members and urges all jurisdictions to apply enhanced due diligence, and, in the most serious cases, countries are called upon to apply counter-measures to protect the international financial system from the money laundering, terrorist financing, and proliferation financing (ML/TF/PF risks emanating from the country.

  • 17 Jun 2022

    High-Risk Jurisdictions subject to a Call for Action - June 2022 High-risk jurisdictions have significant strategic deficiencies in their regimes to counter money laundering, terrorist financing, and financing of proliferation. For all countries identified as high-risk, the FATF calls on all members and urges all jurisdictions to apply enhanced due diligence, and, in the most serious cases, countries are called upon to apply counter-measures to protect the international financial system from the money laundering, terrorist financing, and proliferation financing (ML/TF/PF risks emanating from the country.

  • 3 Mar 2022

    High-Risk Jurisdictions subject to a Call for Action - March 2022 High-risk jurisdictions have significant strategic deficiencies in their regimes to counter money laundering, terrorist financing, and financing of proliferation. For all countries identified as high-risk, the FATF calls on all members and urges all jurisdictions to apply enhanced due diligence, and, in the most serious cases, countries are called upon to apply counter-measures to protect the international financial system from the money laundering, terrorist financing, and proliferation financing (ML/TF/PF risks emanating from the country.

  • 21 Oct 2021

    High-Risk Jurisdictions subject to a Call for Action - October 2021 High-risk jurisdictions have significant strategic deficiencies in their regimes to counter money laundering, terrorist financing, and financing of proliferation. For all countries identified as high-risk, the FATF calls on all members and urges all jurisdictions to apply enhanced due diligence, and, in the most serious cases, countries are called upon to apply counter-measures to protect the international financial system from the money laundering, terrorist financing, and proliferation financing (ML/TF/PF risks emanating from the country.

  • 25 Jun 2021

    High-Risk Jurisdictions subject to a Call for Action - June 2021 High-risk jurisdictions have significant strategic deficiencies in their regimes to counter money laundering, terrorist financing, and financing of proliferation. For all countries identified as high-risk, the FATF calls on all members and urges all jurisdictions to apply enhanced due diligence, and in the most serious cases, countries are called upon to apply counter-measures to protect the international financial system from the ongoing money laundering, terrorist financing, and proliferation financing risks emanating from the country.

  • 25 Feb 2021

    High-Risk Jurisdictions subject to a Call for Action - February 2021 High-risk jurisdictions have significant strategic deficiencies in their regimes to counter money laundering, terrorist financing, and financing of proliferation. For all countries identified as high-risk, the FATF calls on all members and urges all jurisdictions to apply enhanced due diligence, and in the most serious cases, countries are called upon to apply counter-measures to protect the international financial system from the ongoing money laundering, terrorist financing, and proliferation financing risks emanating from the country.

  • 23 Oct 2020

    High-Risk Jurisdictions subject to a Call for Action – 23 October 2020 High-risk jurisdictions have significant strategic deficiencies in their regimes to counter money laundering, terrorist financing, and financing of proliferation. For all countries identified as high-risk, the FATF calls on all members and urges all jurisdictions to apply enhanced due diligence, and in the most serious cases, countries are called upon to apply counter-measures to protect the international financial system from the ongoing money laundering, terrorist financing, and proliferation financing risks emanating from the country.

  • 30 Jun 2020

    High-Risk Jurisdictions subject to a Call for Action – 30 June 2020 High-risk jurisdictions have significant strategic deficiencies in their regimes to counter money laundering, terrorist financing, and financing of proliferation. For all countries identified as high-risk, the FATF calls on all members and urges all jurisdictions to apply enhanced due diligence, and in the most serious cases, countries are called upon to apply counter-measures to protect the international financial system from the ongoing money laundering, terrorist financing, and proliferation financing risks emanating from the country.

  • 21 Feb 2020

    High-Risk Jurisdictions subject to a Call for Action – 21 February 2020 High-risk jurisdictions have significant strategic deficiencies in their regimes to counter money laundering, terrorist financing, and financing of proliferation. For all countries identified as high-risk, the FATF calls on all members and urges all jurisdictions to apply enhanced due diligence, and in the most serious cases, countries are called upon to apply counter-measures to protect the international financial system from the ongoing money laundering, terrorist financing, and proliferation financing risks emanating from the country.

  • 18 Oct 2019

    Public Statement - October 2019 In its October 2019 public statement identifying jurisdictions with strategic deficiencies in anti-money laundering / countering the financing of terrorism measures, the FATF continues to call on countries to apply counter-measures to the Democratic People's Republic of Korea.

  • 21 Jun 2019

    Public Statement - June 2019 In its June 2019 public statement identifying jurisdictions with strategic deficiencies in anti-money laundering / countering the financing of terrorism measures, the FATF continues to call on countries to apply counter-measures to the Democratic People's Republic of Korea.

  • 22 Feb 2019

    Public Statement - February 2019 In its February 2019 public statement identifying jurisdictions with strategic deficiencies in anti-money laundering / countering the financing of terrorism measures, the FATF continues to calls on countries to apply counter-measures to the Democratic People's Republic of Korea.

  • 19 Oct 2018

    Public Statement - October 2018 In its public statement identifying jurisdictions with strategic deficiencies in anti-money laundering / countering the financing of terrorism measures, the FATF continues to calls on countries to apply counter-measures to the Democratic People's Republic of Korea.

  • 29 Jun 2018

    Public Statement In its public statement identifying jurisdictions with strategic deficiencies in anti-money laundering / countering the financing of terrorism measures, the FATF continues to calls on countries to apply counter-measures to the Democratic People's Republic of Korea.

  • 23 Feb 2018

    Public Statement In its public statement identifying jurisdictions with strategic deficiencies in anti-money laundering / countering the financing of terrorism measures, the FATF continues to calls on countries to apply counter-measures to the Democratic People's Republic of Korea.

  • 23 Feb 2018

    Outcomes FATF Plenary, 21-23 February 2018 Under the Presidency of Mr. Santiago Otamendi of Argentina, delegates discussed among other issues combatting terrorist financing, the assessment of Iceland, Iran's actions to address deficiencies in its AML/CFT system.

  • 4 Nov 2017

    Outcomes Joint FATF/GAFILAT Plenary, 1-3 November 2017 Delegates discussed counter-terrorist financing, financial inclusion, information sharing and measures to combat money laundering and the financing of terrorism and proliferation in Portugal and Mexico. They also discussed the follow-up report for Austria, issued a statement on Brazil, discussed AML/CFT improvements in Uganda and issued a statement on DPRK.

  • 3 Nov 2017

    Public Statement In its public statement identifying jurisdictions with strategic deficiencies in anti-money laundering / countering the financing of terrorism measures, the FATF continues to calls on countries to apply counter-measures to the Democratic People's Republic of Korea.

  • 3 Nov 2017

    FATF Statement on the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK) In order to address the threat posed by the DPRK’s illicit activities related to the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction WMD and its financing, the FATF calls upon its members and urges all jurisdictions to effectively implement the relevant FATF recommendations and UNSC Resolutions.

  • 23 Jun 2017

    Public Statement - 23 June 2017 In its public statement identifying jurisdictions with strategic deficiencies in anti-money laundering / countering the financing of terrorism measures, the FATF continues to calls on countries to apply counter-measures to the Democratic People's Republic of Korea.

  • 24 Feb 2017

    Public Statement - 24 February 2017 In its public statement identifying jurisdictions with strategic deficiencies in anti-money laundering / countering the financing of terrorism measures, the FATF continues to calls on countries to apply counter-measures to the Democratic People's Republic of Korea.

  • 21 Oct 2016

    Public Statement - 21 October 2016 In its public statement identifying jurisdictions with strategic deficiencies in anti-money laundering / countering the financing of terrorism measures, the FATF continues to calls on countries to apply counter-measures to the Democratic People's Republic of Korea.

  • 27 Jun 2016

    Outcomes of the Plenary meeting of the FATF, Busan Korea, 22–24 June 2016 Delegates discussed improving transparency and beneficial ownership, and the global response to terrorist financing. The FATF adopted a new Standard for non-profit organisations, issued a statement on Iran and discussed the mutual evaluation reports of Austria, Canada and Singapore. During the list meeting under the Korean Presidency, delegates also heard an update of AML/CFT improvements in Myanmar and Papua New Guinea.

  • 24 Jun 2016

    Public Statement - 24 June 2016 The FATF has updated its public statement identifying jurisdictions with strategic deficiencies in anti-money laundering / countering the financing of terrorism measures. FATF continues to calls on countries to apply counter-measures to the Democratic People's Republic of Korea.

  • 19 Feb 2016

    FATF Public Statement – 19 February 2016 The FATF has updated its public statement identifying jurisdictions with strategic deficiencies in anti-money laundering / countering the financing of terrorism measures. FATF continues to calls on countries to apply counter-measures to Iran and the Democratic People's Republic of Korea.

  • 23 Oct 2015

    FATF Public Statement - 23 October 2015 The FATF has updated its public statement identifying jurisdictions with strategic deficiencies in anti-money laundering / countering the financing of terrorism measures. FATF calls on countries to apply counter-measures to Iran and the Democratic People's Republic of Korea. FATF also calls its members to consider the risks emanating from Myanmar.

  • 27 Feb 2015

    FATF Public Statement - 27 February 2015 The FATF has updated its public statement identifying jurisdictions with strategic deficiencies in anti-money laundering / countering the financing of terrorism measures. FATF calls on countries to apply counter-measures to Iran and the Democratic People's Republic of Korea. FATF also calls its members to consider the risks emanating from Algeria, Ecuador and Myanmar.

  • 24 Oct 2014

    Public Statement - 24 October 2014 The FATF has updated its public statement identifying jurisdictions with strategic deficiencies in anti money-laundering / countering the financing of terrorism measures. FATF calls on countries to apply counter-measures to Iran and the Democratic People's Republic of Korea. FATF also calls its members to consider the risks emanating from Algeria, Ecuador, Indonesia and Myanmar.

  • 27 Jun 2014

    FATF Public Statement - 27 June 2014 The FATF has updated its public statement issued in February 2014 which identifies jurisdictions with strategic anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT deficiencies.

  • 14 Feb 2014

    FATF Public Statement - 14 February 2014 The FATF has updated its public statement issued in October 2013 which identifies jurisdictions with strategic anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT deficiencies.

  • 18 Oct 2013

    FATF Public Statement, 18 October 2013 The FATF has updated its public statement issued in June 2013 which identifies jurisdictions with strategic anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT deficiencies.

  • 21 Jun 2013

    FATF Public Statement - 21 June 2013 The FATF has updated its public statement issued in February 2013 which identifies jurisdictions with strategic anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT deficiencies.

  • 22 Feb 2013

    FATF Public Statement 22 February 2013 The FATF has updated its public statement issued in October 2012 which identifies jurisdictions with strategic anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT deficiencies.

  • 19 Oct 2012

    FATF Public Statement - 19 October 2012 The FATF has updated its public statement issued in June 2012 which identifies jurisdictions with strategic anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT deficiencies.

  • 25 Jun 2012

    FATF Public Statement - 22 June 2012 The FATF has updated its public statement issued in February 2012 which identifies jurisdictions with strategic anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT deficiencies.

  • 28 Oct 2011

    FATF Public Statement - 28 October 2011 The FATF has updated its public statement issued in June 2011 which identifies jurisdictions with strategic anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT deficiencies.

  • 24 Jun 2011

    FATF Public Statement - 24 June 2011 The FATF has updated its public statement issued in February 2011 which identifies jurisdictions with strategic anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT deficiencies.

  • 25 Feb 2011

    FATF Public Statement - 25 February 2011 The FATF has updated its public statement issued in October 2010 which identifies jurisdictions with strategic anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT deficiencies.

  • 22 Oct 2010

    FATF Public Statement - 22 October 2010 The FATF has updated its public statement issued in June 2010 which identifies jurisdictions with strategic anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT deficiencies.

  • 25 Jun 2010

    FATF Public Statement - 25 June 2010 To protect the international financial system from ML/FT risks and to encourage greater compliance with the AML/CFT standards, the FATF identified jurisdictions that have strategic deficiencies and, along with the FATF-style regional bodies FSRBs, works with them to address those deficiencies that pose a risk to the international financial system.

  • 18 Feb 2010

    FATF Public Statement - February 2010 To protect the international financial system from ML/FT risks and to encourage greater compliance with the AML/CFT standards, the FATF identified jurisdictions that have strategic deficiencies and, along with the FATF-style regional bodies FSRBs, works with them to address those deficiencies that pose a risk to the international financial system.

  • 16 Oct 2009

    FATF Statement concerning Iran, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Pakistan and São Tomé and Príncipe - October 2009 Issuing a statement reaffirming its call on members and others jurisdictions for effective counter-measures concerning the risks to the integrity of the international financial system emanating from Iran. The FATF remains concerned about the money laundering and terrorist financing risks emanating from Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Pakistan and São Tomé and Príncipe.

  • 26 Jun 2009

    FATF Statement concerning Iran, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Pakistan and São Tomé and Príncipe - 26 June 2009 Issuing a statement reaffirming its call for effective counter-measures concerning the risks to the integrity of the international financial system emanating from Iran. The FATF remains concerned about the money laundering and terrorist financing risks emanating from Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Pakistan and São Tomé and Príncipe.

  • 25 Feb 2009

    FATF Statement concerning Iran, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Pakistan and São Tomé and Príncipe - 26 February 2009 The anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT systems of Iran, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Pakistan and São Tome and Principe were the subject of a statement issued during the FATF XX Plenary, held in Paris.

  • 16 Oct 2008

    FATF Statement - 16 October 2008 During the FATF Plenary XX in Rio de Janeiro, the FATF issued a statement concerning Iran, Uzbekistan,Turkmenistan, Pakistan and São Tomé and Principe and the AML/CFT improvements in the northern part of Cyprus.

  • 16 Oct 2008

    FATF Statement concerning Iran, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Pakistan, São Tomé and Príncipe and the Northern Part of Cyprus - 16 October 2008 During the FATF Plenary XX in Rio de Janeiro, the FATF issued a statement concerning Iran, Uzbekistan,Turkmenistan, Pakistan and São Tomé and Principe and the AML/CFT improvements in the northern part of Cyprus.

  • 20 Jun 2008

    FATF Statement - 20 June 2008 The FATF Plenary has reaffirmed its public statement of 28 February 2008 regarding the anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism risks posed by Uzbekistan, Iran, Pakistan, Turkmenistan and São Tomé and Principe, and the northern part of Cyprus.

  • 28 Feb 2008

    FATF Statement - 28 February 2008 The FATF is concerned about the lack of comprehensive AML/CFT systems in Uzbekistan, Iran, Pakistan, Turkmenistan, São Tomé and Príncipe and the northern part of Cyprus.

Mutual evaluations

Zimbabwe

Last evaluation
Jan 2017
Possible onsite period
Jan 2027
Possible Plenary discussion
Sep 2027

Gambia

Last evaluation
Dec 2008
Possible onsite period
Sep 2021
Possible Plenary discussion
May 2022

Tunisia

Last evaluation
Jun 2016
Possible onsite period
Possible Plenary discussion
Nov 2026

Ethiopia

Last evaluation
May 2015
Possible onsite period
Jun 2026
Possible Plenary discussion
Mar 2027

Eritrea

missOrigin

Last evaluation
Possible onsite period
Jan 2031
Possible Plenary discussion
Aug 2031

Uganda

Last evaluation
Possible onsite period
Jun 2028
Possible Plenary discussion
Mar 2029

Niue

Last evaluation
Aug 2012
Possible onsite period
Possible Plenary discussion

Equatorial Guinea

Last evaluation
Possible onsite period
May 2032
Possible Plenary discussion
Dec 2032

Samoa

Last evaluation
Oct 2015
Possible onsite period
Possible Plenary discussion

Maldives

Last evaluation
Jul 2011
Possible onsite period
Possible Plenary discussion

Spain

missOrigin

Last evaluation
Dec 2019
Possible onsite period
Apr 2027
Possible Plenary discussion
Oct 2027

Tanzania

Last evaluation
Jan 2023
Possible onsite period
Jan 2030
Possible Plenary discussion
Aug 2030

Jamaica

Last evaluation
Jan 2017
Possible onsite period
Possible Plenary discussion
Jun 2027

Iceland

Last evaluation
Apr 2018
Possible onsite period
Jun 2026
Possible Plenary discussion
Feb 2027

Bosnia and Herzegovina

Last evaluation
Jan 2009
Possible onsite period
Feb 2024
Possible Plenary discussion
Dec 2024

South Sudan

missOrigin

Last evaluation
Possible onsite period
Jan 2029
Possible Plenary discussion
Aug 2029

Finland

Last evaluation
Apr 2019
Possible onsite period
Dec 2027
Possible Plenary discussion
Jun 2028

Mozambique

Last evaluation
Jul 2021
Possible onsite period
Jun 2030
Possible Plenary discussion
Mar 2031

Costa Rica

Last evaluation
Dec 2015
Possible onsite period
Possible Plenary discussion
Jul 2027

Guatemala

Last evaluation
Feb 2017
Possible onsite period
Possible Plenary discussion
Jul 2028

Guyana

Last evaluation
Jul 2011
Possible onsite period
Sep 2023
Possible Plenary discussion
May 2024

Mexico

Last evaluation
Jan 2018
Possible onsite period
Feb 2026
Possible Plenary discussion
Oct 2026

Saudi-Arabia

Last evaluation
Sep 2018
Possible onsite period
Dec 2026
Possible Plenary discussion
Jun 2027

Morocco

Last evaluation
Aug 2019
Possible onsite period
Possible Plenary discussion
May 2028

Democratic Republic of Congo

Last evaluation
Sep 2023
Possible onsite period
May 2027
Possible Plenary discussion
Dec 2027

Indonesia

Last evaluation
Apr 2023
Possible onsite period
Dec 2029
Possible Plenary discussion
Jun 2030

Singapore

Last evaluation
Jun 2016
Possible onsite period
Jun 2025
Possible Plenary discussion
Feb 2026

Slovenia

Last evaluation
Aug 2017
Possible onsite period
Possible Plenary discussion
May 2026

Barbados

Last evaluation
Feb 2018
Possible onsite period
Possible Plenary discussion
Jun 2028

Vanuatu

Last evaluation
Oct 2016
Possible onsite period
Possible Plenary discussion
Jul 2027

Italy

Last evaluation
Oct 2015
Possible onsite period
Jun 2025
Possible Plenary discussion
Feb 2026

Latvia

Last evaluation
Sep 2018
Possible onsite period
Possible Plenary discussion
May 2025

Australia

Last evaluation
Apr 2015
Possible onsite period
Dec 2026
Possible Plenary discussion
Jun 2027

Palestinian Authority

Last evaluation
Possible onsite period
Possible Plenary discussion

Canada

Last evaluation
Jun 2016
Possible onsite period
Nov 2025
Possible Plenary discussion
Jun 2026

Mauritania

Last evaluation
Nov 2018
Possible onsite period
Possible Plenary discussion
May 2027

New Zealand

Last evaluation
Apr 2021
Possible onsite period
Apr 2029
Possible Plenary discussion
Oct 2029

Qatar

Last evaluation
May 2023
Possible onsite period
Aug 2029
Possible Plenary discussion
Feb 2030

Cameroon

Last evaluation
Mar 2022
Possible onsite period
May 2028
Possible Plenary discussion
Dec 2028

Zambia

Last evaluation
Aug 2022
Possible onsite period
Jun 2028
Possible Plenary discussion
Mar 2029

Guernsey

Last evaluation
Possible onsite period
Apr 2024
Possible Plenary discussion
Dec 2024

Belgium

Last evaluation
Feb 2015
Possible onsite period
Feb 2025
Possible Plenary discussion
Oct 2025

Namibia

Last evaluation
Jan 2023
Possible onsite period
Jan 2031
Possible Plenary discussion
Aug 2031

Lesotho

Last evaluation
Feb 2024
Possible onsite period
Jun 2029
Possible Plenary discussion
Mar 2030

Gabon

Last evaluation
Jul 2023
Possible onsite period
Oct 2030
Possible Plenary discussion
May 2031

Denmark

Last evaluation
Aug 2017
Possible onsite period
Aug 2027
Possible Plenary discussion
Feb 2028

China

Last evaluation
Apr 2019
Possible onsite period
Jun 2026
Possible Plenary discussion
Feb 2027

Bangladesh

Last evaluation
Possible onsite period
Nov 2016
Possible Plenary discussion
Jul 2028

Malawi

Last evaluation
Nov 2019
Possible onsite period
Jan 2029
Possible Plenary discussion
Aug 2029

Bahrain

Last evaluation
Sep 2018
Possible onsite period
Dec 2026
Possible Plenary discussion
Jun 2027

United Arab Emirates

Last evaluation
Apr 2020
Possible onsite period
Jun 2026
Possible Plenary discussion
Feb 2027

Russian Federation

Last evaluation
Dec 2019
Possible onsite period
Aug 2028
Possible Plenary discussion
Feb 2029

Mali

Last evaluation
Possible onsite period
Mar 2020
Possible Plenary discussion
May 2028

Venezuela

Last evaluation
Sep 2009
Possible onsite period
Jan 2022
Possible Plenary discussion
Nov 2022

Germany

Last evaluation
Aug 2022
Possible onsite period
Apr 2029
Possible Plenary discussion
Oct 2029

Curaçao, Kingdom of the Netherlands

Last evaluation
Possible onsite period
Jun 2024
Possible Plenary discussion
May 2025

Somalia

Last evaluation
Possible onsite period
Aug 2024
Possible Plenary discussion
May 2025

Fiji

Last evaluation
Nov 2016
Possible onsite period
Possible Plenary discussion
Jul 2027

Senegal

Last evaluation
Aug 2019
Possible onsite period
Possible Plenary discussion
May 2027

Congo

Last evaluation
Sep 2022
Possible onsite period
Oct 2029
Possible Plenary discussion
May 2030

Honduras

Last evaluation
Nov 2016
Possible onsite period
Possible Plenary discussion
Dec 2027

Kenya

Last evaluation
Jan 2023
Possible onsite period
Jun 2031
Possible Plenary discussion
Mar 2032

Mauritius

Last evaluation
Jul 2018
Possible onsite period
Jan 2028
Possible Plenary discussion
Aug 2028

Dominica

Last evaluation
Jul 2019
Possible onsite period
Aug 2022
Possible Plenary discussion
May 2022

Syria

Last evaluation
Nov 2006
Possible onsite period
Possible Plenary discussion

South Africa

Last evaluation
Oct 2021
Possible onsite period
Apr 2027
Possible Plenary discussion
Oct 2027

Sint Maarten, Kingdom of the Netherlands

Last evaluation
Possible onsite period
Sep 2024
Possible Plenary discussion
May 2025

Thailand

Last evaluation
Dec 2017
Possible onsite period
Possible Plenary discussion
Jul 2028

Eritrea

Last evaluation
Possible onsite period
Jun 2024
Possible Plenary discussion
Apr 2025

Chad

Last evaluation
Nov 2023
Possible onsite period
Oct 2030
Possible Plenary discussion
May 2031

Greece

Last evaluation
Sep 2019
Possible onsite period
Aug 2029
Possible Plenary discussion
Feb 2030

Sri Lanka

Last evaluation
Oct 2015
Possible onsite period
Possible Plenary discussion
Jul 2027

Botswana

Last evaluation
Oct 2017
Possible onsite period
Jun 2027
Possible Plenary discussion
Apr 2028

Libya

Last evaluation
Possible onsite period
Possible Plenary discussion

Sao Tome & Principe

Last evaluation
Possible onsite period
Feb 2024
Possible Plenary discussion
Nov 2024

France

Last evaluation
May 2022
Possible onsite period
Aug 2029
Possible Plenary discussion
Feb 2030

Ghana

Last evaluation
Apr 2018
Possible onsite period
Possible Plenary discussion
Nov 2026

Israel

Last evaluation
Dec 2018
Possible onsite period
Dec 2028
Possible Plenary discussion
Jun 2029

Cuba

Last evaluation
Dec 2015
Possible onsite period
Possible Plenary discussion
Dec 2026

United States

Last evaluation
Nov 2016
Possible onsite period
Feb 2026
Possible Plenary discussion
Oct 2026

Central African Republic

Last evaluation
Dec 2023
Possible onsite period
May 2031
Possible Plenary discussion
Dec 2031

Serbia

Last evaluation
Jun 2016
Possible onsite period
Possible Plenary discussion
Dec 2025

Switzerland

Last evaluation
Dec 2016
Possible onsite period
Aug 2027
Possible Plenary discussion
Feb 2028

Portugal

Last evaluation
Dec 2017
Possible onsite period
Aug 2028
Possible Plenary discussion
Feb 2029

Norway

Last evaluation
Dec 2014
Possible onsite period
Apr 2028
Possible Plenary discussion
Oct 2028

Montserrat

Last evaluation
Jul 2011
Possible onsite period
Apr 2024
Possible Plenary discussion
Nov 2024

United Kingdom

Last evaluation
May 2022
Possible onsite period
Aug 2027
Possible Plenary discussion
Feb 2028

Türkiye

Last evaluation
Oct 2019
Possible onsite period
Nov 2025
Possible Plenary discussion
Jun 2026

Trinidad & Tobago

Last evaluation
Jun 2016
Possible onsite period
Possible Plenary discussion
Nov 2026

Antigua and Barbuda

Last evaluation
Oct 2018
Possible onsite period
Possible Plenary discussion
Jun 2028

Sweden

Last evaluation
Apr 2017
Possible onsite period
Dec 2027
Possible Plenary discussion
Jun 2028

Malaysia

Last evaluation
Sep 2015
Possible onsite period
Feb 2025
Possible Plenary discussion
Oct 2025

Anguilla

Last evaluation
Jul 2010
Possible onsite period
Jul 2023
Possible Plenary discussion
May 2024

Eswatini

Last evaluation
Aug 2022
Possible onsite period
Jan 2030
Possible Plenary discussion
Aug 2030

Bahamas

Last evaluation
Aug 2017
Possible onsite period
Possible Plenary discussion
Jun 2027

Ireland

Last evaluation
Sep 2017
Possible onsite period
Apr 2028
Possible Plenary discussion
Oct 2028

Seychelles

Last evaluation
Nov 2018
Possible onsite period
Jun 2027
Possible Plenary discussion
Apr 2028

Bermuda

Last evaluation
Jan 2020
Possible onsite period
Possible Plenary discussion
Nov 2027

Hong Kong, China

Last evaluation
Sep 2019
Possible onsite period
Dec 2029
Possible Plenary discussion
Jun 2030

Austria

Last evaluation
Jun 2016
Possible onsite period
Jun 2025
Possible Plenary discussion
Feb 2026

Republic of Korea

Last evaluation
Apr 2020
Possible onsite period
Dec 2028
Possible Plenary discussion
Jun 2029

Japan

Last evaluation
Aug 2021
Possible onsite period
Aug 2028
Possible Plenary discussion
Feb 2029

Burkina Faso

Last evaluation
Aug 2019
Possible onsite period
Possible Plenary discussion
Nov 2027

Burundi

Last evaluation
Possible onsite period
Jan 2026
Possible Plenary discussion
Sep 2026

Armenia

Last evaluation
Jan 2016
Possible onsite period
Possible Plenary discussion
May 2026

Madagascar

Last evaluation
Oct 2018
Possible onsite period
Possible Plenary discussion
Mar 2027

Yemen

Last evaluation
Apr 2009
Possible onsite period
Possible Plenary discussion

Tajikistan

Last evaluation
Jan 2019
Possible onsite period
Possible Plenary discussion
Nov 2027

Kyrgyz Republic

Last evaluation
Sep 2018
Possible onsite period
Possible Plenary discussion
Jun 2027

Angola

Last evaluation
Jun 2023
Possible onsite period
Jan 2032
Possible Plenary discussion
Aug 2032

Ratings

Effectiveness

Ratings that reflect the extent to which a country's measures are effective. The assessment is conducted on the basis of 11 immediate outcomes, which represent key goals that an effective AML/CFT system should achieve.

Benin Follow-Up Report 2023

IO1
LE
IO2
LE
IO3
LE
IO4
LE
IO5
LE
IO6
LE
IO7
LE
IO8
LE
IO9
LE
IO10
LE
IO11
LE

Technical Compliance

Definition

Ratings which reflect the extent to which a country has implemented the technical requirements of the FATF Recommendations.

C = compliant   |   LC = largely compliant     |   PC = partially compliant   |   NC = non-compliant

Benin Follow-Up Report 2023

R.1 - Assessing risk & applying risk-based approach
LC
R.2 - National cooperation and coordination
LC
R.3 - Money laundering offence
LC
R.4 - Confiscation and provisional measures
PC
R.5 - Terrorist financing offence
PC
R.6 - Targeted financial sanctions related to terrorism & terrorist financing
LC
R.7 - Targeted financial sanctions related to proliferation
LC
R.8 - Non-profit organisations
NC
R.9 - Financial institution secrecy laws
C
R.10 - Customer due diligence
PC
R.11 - Record keeping
LC
R.12 - Politically exposed persons
PC
R.13 - Correspondent banking
LC
R.14 - Money or value transfer services
PC
R.15 - New technologies
NC
R.16 - Wire transfers
PC
R.17 - Reliance on third parties
LC
R.18 - Internal controls and foreign branches and subsidiaries
LC
R.19 - Higher-risk countries
NC
R.20 - Reporting of suspicious transactions
PC
R.21 - Tipping-off and confidentiality
C
R.22 - DNFBPs: Customer due diligence
PC
R.23 - DNFBPs: Other measures
PC
R.24 - Transparency and beneficial ownership of legal persons
NC
R.25 - Transparency and beneficial ownership of legal arrangements
NC
R.26 - Regulation and supervision of financial institutions
PC
R.27 - Powers of supervisors
C
R.28 - Regulation and supervision of DNFBPs
NC
R.29 - Financial intelligence units
C
R.30 - Responsibilities of law enforcement and investigative authorities
C
R.31 - Powers of law enforcement and investigative authorities
C
R.32 - Cash couriers
PC
R.33 - Statistics
LC
R.34 - Guidance and feedback
PC
R.35- Sanctions
LC
R.36 - International instruments
LC
R.37 - Mutual legal assistance
C
R.38 - Mutual legal assistance: freezing and confiscation
LC
R.39 - Extradition
LC
R.40 - Other forms of international cooperation
LC